CPAC Vice Chair Resigns Amid Turmoil: A Closer Look at the Turbulence within the Conservative Political Action Coalition

The Conservative Political Action Coalition (CPAC) has recently been rocked by a series of resignations and controversies, shining a spotlight on the organization’s leadership, financial practices, and internal turmoil. In this article, we will delve into the latest developments surrounding CPAC and explore the reasons behind the resignation of its vice chair, Charlie Gerow. We will also examine the allegations of sexual assault against CPAC Chairman Matt Schlapp and the concerns raised about the organization’s finances. Let’s take a closer look at the unfolding events that have thrust CPAC into the spotlight.

Resignation of Charlie Gerow: A Call for Investigations

Charlie Gerow, a prominent attorney and communications executive, has served on the board of CPAC and its parent organization, the American Conservative Union (ACU), for nearly two decades. However, Gerow recently submitted his letter of resignation, citing concerns about the organization’s leadership and financial practices. In his resignation statement, Gerow called for investigations into the allegations against Chairman Matt Schlapp and an independent forensic audit of CPAC’s finances. Gerow also emphasized the need to review the exit interviews of former staff members who have recently left the organization.

Allegations of Sexual Assault and Lawsuits

The turmoil at CPAC intensified earlier this year when Matt Schlapp, the organization’s chairman, was sued by a former staffer from Herschel Walker’s Senate campaign. The lawsuit alleged sexual assault, casting a dark shadow over CPAC’s leadership. These serious allegations have prompted calls for an independent investigation into the matter, as well as an examination of CPAC’s handling of the situation. Schlapp has denied the accusations of misconduct, but the controversy surrounding the allegations has undoubtedly put CPAC under scrutiny.

Financial Concerns and Resignations

CPAC has not only faced allegations of sexual assault but also financial concerns that have raised eyebrows within the organization. Bob Beauprez, who served as treasurer under Chairman Schlapp, resigned in May, citing concerns about the organization’s financial reports. Beauprez’s departure was followed by resignations from board members Randy Neugebauer and Mike Rose. Just last week, Timothy Ryan also resigned from the board, further highlighting the ongoing turbulence at CPAC.

Lack of Meaningful Changes and Staff Turnover

Despite the significant departures of long-time board members and high staff turnover, CPAC has seemingly failed to address the underlying issues plaguing the organization. Charlie Gerow expressed his disappointment in the lack of meaningful changes and called on the board to take action. It remains to be seen how CPAC will respond to these calls for investigations, audits, and reviews of its practices.

CPAC’s Influence and Expansion under Schlapp’s Leadership

Under Matt Schlapp’s tenure as chairman, CPAC has expanded its reach and influence within the conservative movement. The organization has hosted a series of international CPAC conferences, attracting top Republican Party figures to its gatherings. Schlapp has aligned himself closely with former President Donald Trump, solidifying CPAC’s position as a key ally of the Trump administration. However, the recent controversies surrounding CPAC have raised questions about its leadership and the future direction of the organization.

Conclusion: CPAC at a Crossroads

The resignation of Charlie Gerow and the subsequent demands for investigations into sexual assault allegations and financial practices have thrust CPAC into a period of uncertainty. The organization, once a prominent conservative movement ally, now finds itself grappling with internal turmoil and the need for transparency. As CPAC navigates this challenging period, it remains to be seen how it will address the concerns raised by Gerow and others. The future of CPAC hangs in the balance, and its response to these challenges will undoubtedly shape its credibility and influence within the conservative movement.